Skip to content
Compliance

Walk Into the Audit With AI Evidence Already Collected

Seven frameworks pre-mapped to 53 controls, evidence generated continuously, signed bundles ready to export, and an AI Register that maintains itself.

What Keeps You Up

AI Questions With No Evidence Behind Them

  • New audit scope. Auditors now ask about AI governance, and the control set was written before AI agents existed.
  • Manual collection. Evidence is assembled by hand each cycle from screenshots and spreadsheets.
  • Silent regressions. A control that was proven in March can quietly lose its evidence by June.
  • The EU AI Act. Register and risk-tier obligations require an inventory nobody is maintaining.
Answers

The Questions You Can Now Answer

  • Which controls are proven right now, and which are partial or unproven?
  • What evidence supports SOC 2 CC6.1 for AI tooling this quarter?
  • Which AI systems are in use, at what risk tier, approved by whom?
  • Has any control lost its evidence since the last review?
  • Can we hand an auditor a verifiable package without a two-week collection cycle?
Compliance coverage view showing the gap between claimed and proven control coverage with a per-control grid
Control coverage - the gap between claimed and proven coverage, with every control resolving to the evidence behind it.

See Your Coverage Before the Audit Does

A walkthrough of framework coverage, evidence bundles, and the AI Register on live fleet data.

[email protected]kraitos.io